Mmreiroeorerio

 ndsap way of privatizing things,here it is 'alt private marriage' like the ndsap did in their privation, this type of private marriage would be discimatory to gays as christians and rightists would be able to take advantage of this ndsap type of privatiation (but here w marriage) to exclude queer people from it (since its private)

from pre main blog, original 'left' blog

This very specific form of conditional Privatized marriage for straight and same sex couples would be within a structure of growing control of the marriage industry by the government through political intervention and regulation via a newly created Independent group of marriage companies board created by the government. Thus the government would have a role in regulating and controlling the marriages in the country despite them being privatized

This would also include the privatization of some public sectors of the US government that have connections (direct and indirect) of the marriage industry,  by companies affiliated with NGOs or the government.

The government would give credits to private marriage companies with millions of earmarks to promote good relationships between them. The government would also make laws demanding that all marriage companies in the US join a newly created Independent group of companies or suffer penalties

Moreover, marriage companies in the US who were loyal to the government and their goals in running the privatized marriage industry the way they wanted would be rewarded with protection and more favorable, pro business laws create for said complying companies (which would increase the profits and investment for those marriage companies).   However, due to the nature of this very specific form of conditional privatization, the government could manipulate this system to do what it wants despite it being privatized.

The view of human rights here "I don’t really care about human rights since human rights are a bourgeois concept that at times are used to defend the right. " from my main blog

Simone Weil view of human rights here (from private blog)

This view of Queer rights here (from private blog)

The view of Queer rights here: (dongistan subreddit by cuclid)

"For some Queer people, Alexander Dugin has been as much of an inspiration for their anti-imperialism as Vladimir Lenin.... Go read his works. Alexander Dugin rejects racism and fascism completely and in no improper terms. 

Dugin doesn't support "LGBTQ" as a political bloc and neither does this post ideology (long before LGBTQ leftists were exposed to Dugin's works, they had already identified the anti-proletarian nature of the movement) and thats good, actually. 

Any good marxist needs exposure to thinkers that we are supposedly at odds with.... something to learn from our enemies. Alexander Dugin has reversed the position he took on China in the 1990s, when he mistakenly said they were on the western path to liberalism and praised the wisdom of the CPC. Thus, Dugin is pro-communist. his anti-communist statements were made during the collapse of the USSR, of course he had a negative opinion of the system which lead his people to that humiliation. Seeing communism in China has reversed that position he previously took.

Leftist Queers who read Alexander Dugin are not sissies to believe in that ideology. I just think people can do whatever they want with their private life (as long it is not harmful to the collectivity, like doing drugs or gambling). Gender ideology is one thing, recognizing the existence of gender is a whole different thing. Iran, for example, have transgenders concept different from the west based on their culture, and much older by the way. Arabian, Chinese, Russians, all of those cultures have their ideal of what is being a man and what is being a woman, or, like Iran, being a third thing. 

Even ideologies like reactionaryism or liberalism have an ideal for what is being a man or a woman. Dugin wrote a lot about gender, it is a very interesting reading."